Analisis Eksperimental Dampak Pemasangan Bracing Pada Struktur SDOF Dan MDOF Terhadap Beban Getar Horizontal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25077/jbkd.3.3.135-147.2025Keywords:
bresing, frekuensi, degree of freedom, percepatan, perpindahanAbstract
Buildings subjected to horizontal vibration loading can cause displacement deformation and even collapse. Laboratory-scale testing to simulate vibrations due to horizontal loading can be done using structural modeling using a shaking table as the vibration source medium. This can be done because large-scale testing is very difficult to do due to cost and time constraints. This study aims to analyze the impact of bracing use on the response of Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) and Multi Degree of Freedom (MDOF) structures due to horizontal vibration loads. The building models tested were one to three-story models with and without bracing. Testing was carried out using a one-way horizontal shaking table with varying frequencies of 15 Hz, 20 Hz, and 25 Hz to see the differences in each structural response. The parameters observed in this study were model displacement and acceleration. The study results show that the model without bracing experiences a maximum acceleration at each vibration table frequency of 490 cm/s2 with a vibration table frequency of 15 Hz, 649 cm/s2 with a vibration table frequency of 20 Hz, and 774 cm/s2 with a vibration table frequency of 25 Hz. Meanwhile, the model using bracing experiences the largest acceleration reduction of up to 35% for a vibration table frequency of 25 Hz. Bracing increases the lateral stiffness of the structure thereby reducing deformation to be smaller than the structure without bracing. The maximum displacement value of the model without bracing at each frequency is 1.08 cm at a vibration table frequency of 15 Hz, 1.54 cm at a vibration table frequency of 20 Hz, and 2.84 cm at a vibration table frequency of 25 Hz. From the study conducted, it can be concluded that the use of bracing in SDOF and MDOF structures has a reduction in structural response of up to 35%.
Downloads
References
Asgarian, B., & Shokrgozar, H. (2009). BRBF response modification factor. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65, 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2008.08.002
Bruneau, M., Uang, C.-M., & Whittaker, A. S. (1998). Ductile design of steel structures (Vol. 389). McGraw-Hill New York.
Cheng, S., Zhu, Y.-X., Sun, K., & Zhang, W.-P. (2021). Shake-table testing of a 1:5 reduced-scale five-story masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frame structure. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 79, 373. https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2021.79.3.373
Chopra, A. K. (2007). Dynamics of structures. Pearson Education India.
Gajbhiye, S. (2021). Seismic Effects on Different Structural Members. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. https://doi.org/10.22214/IJRASET.2021.36589
Han, R., & Zhao, X. (2021). Shaking Table Tests and Validation of Multi-Modal Sensing and Damage Detection Using Smartphones. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100477
Hejazi, F., & Chun, T. (2020). Free Vibration of Single Degree of Freedom System. Conceptual Theories in Structural Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5440-7_3
Liu, S., Lu, Z., Li, P., Ding, S., & Wan, F. (2020). Shaking table test and numerical simulation of eddy-current tuned mass damper for structural seismic control considering soil-structure interaction. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110531
Nazila, K. S., & Kamaludin, K. (2019). Pembesaran Gaya Dalam dan Rasio Kekuatan Elemen Struktur Baja untuk berbagai Zona Gempa di Indonesia. (Hal. 74-84). RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknil Sipil. https://doi.org/10.26760/REKARACANA.V5I1.74
Rochmah, N., Beatrix, M., & Sutriono, B. (2021). Studi Perencanaan Gedung Tingkat Tinggi Dan Gedung Tingkat Rendah Dengan Menggunakan Bresing Konsentrik. Extrapolasi. https://doi.org/10.30996/extrapolasi.v18i2.6019
Shin, H.-M., Haroon, M., Shin, K.-J., & Lee, H.-D. (2024). Dynamic response of RC frames retrofitted with friction-damped brace system through shaking table tests. Case Studies in Construction Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02725
Suryanita, R., Maizir, H., Yuniorto, E., & Jingga, H. (2018). Intelligent seismic risk mitigation system on structure building. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/106/1/012003
Tremblay, R., & Poncet, L. (2005). Seismic performance of concentrically braced steel frames in multistory buildings with mass irregularity. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(9), 1363–1375.
Ubaid, M., & Khan, R. (2023). Effect of bracing configuration on the seismic response of buildings with re-entrant corners. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 8, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-01029-x
Wang, X., Ren, W., Liu, B., & Hu, D. (2022). Structural Dynamics and Vibration Analysis of the MDOF Systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2381. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2381/1/012004
Xu, K., & Mita, A. (2021). Estimation of Maximum Drift of MDOF Shear Structures Using Only One Accelerometer. 18, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644901311-14
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Wafiq Tauladan, Intan Monica MG, Reni Suryanita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Bangunan, Konstruksi & Desain (JBKD) is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0

