Optimasi Konfigurasi Bresing Konsentris Ditinjau Dari Biaya Konstruksi, Kemudahan Fabrikasi, Dan Metode Ereksi Struktur Baja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25077/jbkd.4.2.126-138.2026Keywords:
bresing konsentris, biaya konstruksi, fabrikasi baja, ereksi baja, warehouse, optimasiAbstract
Pemilihan konfigurasi bresing konsentris pada struktur baja tidak hanya memengaruhi kinerja struktur, tetapi juga biaya konstruksi, kemudahan fabrikasi, dan metode ereksi. Penelitian ini merupakan pengembangan dari studi komparatif sistem bresing konsentris pada warehouse dengan konfigurasi X, Inverted V, K, dan Diagonal. Kajian difokuskan pada pekerjaan bresing saja, tanpa memasukkan elemen struktur lain seperti kolom, balok, rafter, gording, dan ikatan angin. Berat total bresing yang dianalisis adalah 2.917,18 kg untuk tipe X, 2.103,61 kg untuk Inverted V, 2.492,44 kg untuk K, dan 2.625,46 kg untuk Diagonal. Biaya dihitung menggunakan HSP Kota Padang Tahun Anggaran 2026 sebesar Rp60.618,43/kg. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Inverted V memiliki biaya terendah, yaitu Rp127.517.536 atau 27,89% lebih murah dibandingkan tipe X. Namun, berdasarkan batasan kinerja struktur, tipe X tetap menjadi konfigurasi paling layak secara teknis.
Downloads
References
Anunciação, N. C., Souza, L. G. Q., Pereira, A. A., Ribeiro, C. B., & Barboza, M. D. S. (2021). Comparative analysis of bracing systems in a steel structure shed. World Congress in Computational Mechanics and Eccomas Congress, 900. https://doi.org/10.23967/wccm-eccomas.2020.085
Dyanati, M., Huang, Q., & Roke, D. (2017). Cost-benefit evaluation of self-centring concentrically braced frames considering uncertainties. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(5), 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1173070
Hashemi Rezvani, F., Taghizadeh, M. A. M., & Reza Ronagh, H. (2019). Estimating the cross-sectional area of inverted-V braces required for mitigating the progressive collapse of Steel Intermediate Moment Resisting Frames. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 15(8), 1075–1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1602148
Kavitha, R., Logeshwaran, S., Sabarinathan, S., & Vijai Anand, V. (2023). Structural analysis and design for a warehouse using STAAD PRO. Materials Today Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.479
Krumpen III, R. P., & Carrato, P. J. (2009). Comparative study of bolted versus welded SCBF connections. Proceedings of the 2009 Structures Congress Don T Mess with Structural Engineers Expanding Our Role, 1357–1363. https://doi.org/10.1061/41031(341)148
Lee, K. S. (2015). An experimental study on non-compression X-bracing systems using carbon fiber composite cable for seismic strengthening of RC buildings. Polymers, 7(9), 1716–1731. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7091480
Li, L., Dawe, J. L., & Dukuze, A. (2003). Knife-plate connections for tubular bracing. Proceedings Annual Conference Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, 2003, 1378–1387.
Nguyen, H.-P., & Nguyen, P.-C. (2025). The Impact of Different Bracing Ratios on the Structural Performance of Planar Steel Frames. Engineering Technology and Applied Science Research, 15(3), 22388–22393. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8928
Pradeep, A., Thampi, A. R., Shrikant, Susan Sam, H., & Joseph, L. (2022). Stability analysis of high-rise building and optimization of bracing configuration. Materials Today Proceedings, 65, 1990–1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.324
Putri Elza, S., & Murdiaman Guci, J. (2025a). STUDI KOMPARATIF SISTEM BAJA BRESING KOSENTRIS PADA WAREHOUSE DENGAN KONFIGURASI X, V, K, DAN DIAGONAL. Analisis Sipil Aktual, 1(4).
Putri Elza, S., & Murdiaman Guci, J. (2025b). STUDI KOMPARATIF SISTEM BAJA BRESING KOSENTRIS PADA WAREHOUSE DENGAN KONFIGURASI X, V, K, DAN DIAGONAL. Analisis Sipil Aktual, 1(4).
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill.
Shameli, R., Babu, T. L., & Vasugi, V. (2026). Comparative Study on Behaviour of Steel Building Frame with X, K, and V Bracing. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering: 749 LNCE. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-2014-5_23
Souri, O., & Mofid, M. (2023). Seismic evaluation of concentrically braced steel frames equipped with yielding elements and BRBs. Results in Engineering, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100853
Ubaid, M., & Khan, R. A. (2023). Effect of bracing configuration on the seismic response of buildings with re-entrant corners. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-01029-x
Vivek Kumar, C., Swetha, R. R., Manoj, T., & Preetham, K. (2025). Seismic response assessment of steel frame building with cross braced systems in different locations of multi-storey building. Procedia Structural Integrity, 70, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2025.07.031
Yang, T. Y., Sheikh, H., & Tobber, L. (2019). Influence of the brace configurations on the seismic performance of steel concentrically braced frames. Frontiers in Built Environment, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00027
Yeom, H.-J., & Yoo, J.-H. (2018). Analytical Investigation on Seismic Behavior of Inverted V-braced Frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, 18(1), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0315-4
Zhao, Q., & Astaneh-Asl, A. (2003). Cyclic behavior of composite shear wall systems. Proceedings Annual Technical Session Structural Stability Research Council, 639–658.
Zumrut, I. B., Baran, H. B., & Ozbalta, T. G. (2022). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Selecting a Structural System of an Industrial Facility. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 14(1), 2656–2665. https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2022-0010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Febiana Maulani, Jeply Murdiaman Guci, Riko Zulhendra, Suci Putri Elza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Bangunan, Konstruksi & Desain (JBKD) is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0
